linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/13] ASoC: Intel: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "sst_dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 05 Jan 2015 16:18:07 +0100
From:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/13] ASoC: Intel: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "sst_dma_free"

At Mon, 5 Jan 2015 14:35:51 +0000,
Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 02:08:42PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> > Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 19:03:55 +0100
> > 
> > The sst_dma_free() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
> > returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
> 
> I'm missing aptches 1-5, are there any dependencies?

No, all individual fixes.


Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/