linux-kernel - Re: scsi: non atomic allocation in mempool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 Jan 2015 20:42:03 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>, bvanassche@....org,
	hare@...e.de, JBottomley@...allels.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: scsi: non atomic allocation in mempool_alloc in atomic context

On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 12:38:04PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> That was true in earlier kernels as well, going back a few versions at
> least, preempt was disabled on calling __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(). Just
> checked, and 3.16 and later have that as the behaviour. The only change
> in 3.19 some shuffling around to avoid double preempt_disable in some
> cases, it's now using get_cpu() and friends.
> 
> So we probably want do mark that as stable so we reach back to when
> scsi-mq was added, unless the originally referenced patch getting rid of
> the gfp_t mask didn't have the issue.

Before that commit we always passed down GFP_ATOMIC, so we'll only
need the patch for 3.19.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/