lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 05 Jan 2015 13:18:27 -0800
From:	Dave Hansen <>
To:	Andi Kleen <>
CC:	Andy Lutomirski <>,,,
	Thomas Gleixner <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.19 3/3] x86, mpx: Change the MPX enable/disable API
 to arch_prctl

On 01/05/2015 12:42 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Dave Hansen <> writes:
>> On 12/29/2014 04:52 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> This has the benefit the it avoids cluttering prctl with more
>>> arch-specific functionality.  The down side is that arch_prctl will
>>> need to be wired up as a 32-bit syscall to add 32-bit support for
>>> MPX.
>> There is existing userspace out there which depends on the existing
>> prctl() setup.  There isn't a _lot_ and it might still be able to be
>> changed easily, but this isn't a given.
>> I'll check in with the folks doing the gcc (runtime) part of this next
>> week and see what they think.
> It'll be quite messy for 32bit because they would need to use syscall(),
> as glibc won't have a arch_prctl stub.

Yeah, I'd _really_ prefer not to change it.  The code is in a gcc
branch, but is getting pulled in to the 5.0 release.  We've got
*absolutely* no shortage of prctl numbers.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists