[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1648651.DmmjNgUaYH@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 00:30:56 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>
Cc: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>,
"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...ica.org" <devel@...ica.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: acpica: utmisc.c: Remove unused function
On Monday, January 05, 2015 08:32:59 AM Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi, Rickard
>
> > From: Rickard Strandqvist [mailto:rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se]
> > Sent: Friday, January 02, 2015 1:16 AM
> >
> > Remove the function acpi_ut_is_aml_table() that is not used anywhere.
>
> This function is used by the ACPICA debugger and disassembler.
> The ACPICA release process has just automatically released this function from the ACPICA code base to the Linux kernel.
>
> We shouldn't just remove it from the Linux kernel code base.
> If we do so, it's just turned into divergences that can hurt the release automation.
> You may use ACPI_FUTURE_USAGE around these functions instead.
Can we do that in upstream ACPICA?
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists