linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] CMA: aggressively allocate the pages on cma reserved memory when not used

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 Jan 2015 17:23:29 +0900
From:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To:	Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@...sung.com>, Marek@...per.es,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] CMA: aggressively allocate the pages on cma
 reserved memory when not used

On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 08:01:45PM -0800, Gregory Fong wrote:
> +linux-mm and linux-kernel (not sure how those got removed from cc,
> sorry about that)
> 
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com> wrote:
> > Hi Joonsoo,
> >
> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> wrote:
> >> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> >> index 674ade7..ca678b6 100644
> >> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> >> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> >> @@ -788,6 +788,56 @@ void __init __free_pages_bootmem(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  #ifdef CONFIG_CMA
> >> +void adjust_managed_cma_page_count(struct zone *zone, long count)
> >> +{
> >> +       unsigned long flags;
> >> +       long total, cma, movable;
> >> +
> >> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
> >> +       zone->managed_cma_pages += count;
> >> +
> >> +       total = zone->managed_pages;
> >> +       cma = zone->managed_cma_pages;
> >> +       movable = total - cma - high_wmark_pages(zone);
> >> +
> >> +       /* No cma pages, so do only movable allocation */
> >> +       if (cma <= 0) {
> >> +               zone->max_try_movable = pageblock_nr_pages;
> >> +               zone->max_try_cma = 0;
> >> +               goto out;
> >> +       }
> >> +
> >> +       /*
> >> +        * We want to consume cma pages with well balanced ratio so that
> >> +        * we have consumed enough cma pages before the reclaim. For this
> >> +        * purpose, we can use the ratio, movable : cma. And we doesn't
> >> +        * want to switch too frequently, because it prevent allocated pages
> >> +        * from beging successive and it is bad for some sorts of devices.
> >> +        * I choose pageblock_nr_pages for the minimum amount of successive
> >> +        * allocation because it is the size of a huge page and fragmentation
> >> +        * avoidance is implemented based on this size.
> >> +        *
> >> +        * To meet above criteria, I derive following equation.
> >> +        *
> >> +        * if (movable > cma) then; movable : cma = X : pageblock_nr_pages
> >> +        * else (movable <= cma) then; movable : cma = pageblock_nr_pages : X
> >> +        */
> >> +       if (movable > cma) {
> >> +               zone->max_try_movable =
> >> +                       (movable * pageblock_nr_pages) / cma;
> >> +               zone->max_try_cma = pageblock_nr_pages;
> >> +       } else {
> >> +               zone->max_try_movable = pageblock_nr_pages;
> >> +               zone->max_try_cma = cma * pageblock_nr_pages / movable;
> >
> > I don't know if anyone's already pointed this out (didn't see anything
> > when searching lkml), but while testing this, I noticed this can
> > result in a div by zero under memory pressure (movable becomes 0).
> > This is not unlikely when the majority of pages are in CMA regions
> > (this may seem pathological but we do actually do this right now).

Hello,

Yes, you are right. Thanks for pointing this out.
I will fix it on next version.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/