lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 6 Jan 2015 18:21:57 +0900
From:	"kyhw" <kyhw@...i.co.kr>
To:	"'Jiri Kosina'" <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc:	<rydberg@...omail.se>, <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Add VID/PID for HID-type Multi-Touch Module of AFO CO.,   LTD.

Thanks.

you are right. That's not necessary.
We already processed.

The final purpose of my approach is that the correct working of the AFO
multi-Touch module in All distribution of Linux.
Therefore, the inclusion of the VID,PID(AFO Touch Module) to the
hid-multitouch module is basically needed also for old version of the Linux
distribution.

Ki.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jiri Kosina [mailto:jkosina@...e.cz] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 11:44 PM
To: YongHwan Ki
Cc: rydberg@...omail.se; linux-input@...r.kernel.org;
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Add VID/PID for HID-type Multi-Touch Module of AFO CO.,
LTD.

On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, YongHwan Ki wrote:

> Sorry, I woud like to add the AFO defines in the Linux Kernel.
> No afo defines exists in the current kernel tree.
> I correctly changed the log for adding the afo defines.
> 
> Kernel Version : linux-3.14.rc7
> Signed-off-by: Yonghwan Ki <kyhw@...i.co.kr>
> 
> diff -uprN -X Documentation/dontdiff ./drivers/hid/hid-core.c
../linux-3.14-rc7m/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> --- ./drivers/hid/hid-core.c	2014-03-17 10:51:24.000000000 +0900
> +++ ../linux-3.14-rc7m/drivers/hid/hid-core.c	2014-03-21
17:41:51.846939444 +0900
> @@ -1881,6 +1881,8 @@ static const struct hid_device_id hid_ha
>  	{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZEROPLUS, 0x0005) },
>  	{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZEROPLUS, 0x0030) },
>  	{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZYDACRON, 
> USB_DEVICE_ID_ZYDACRON_REMOTE_CONTROL) },
> +	{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_AFO, USB_DEVICE_ID_AFO_TCM) },
> +	{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_AFO, USB_DEVICE_ID_AFO_THM) },

Is this really necessary? Why doesn't HID_DG_CONTACTID matching work for the
to automatically trigger HID_GROUP_MULTITOUCH-based binding?

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ