linux-kernel - Re: 答复: [PATCH v6 17/17] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54ABC551.3080005@linaro.org>
Date:	Tue, 06 Jan 2015 19:21:53 +0800
From:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To:	liyi 00215672 <phoenix.liyi@...wei.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC:	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
	Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	"Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com" <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com>,
	Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
	"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: 答复: [PATCH v6 17/17] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64

Hi Yi,

On 2015年01月06日 17:52, liyi 00215672 wrote:
> In traditional telecom market, what confused us(Huawei) was our software and
> hardware coupling together oftentimes. So if we change some hardware then we
> MUST modify our software, which was not our customer’s expectation. In x86 world,
> we have UEFI and ACPI technologies, they are suitable to solve this problem very
> well, we just upgrade our hardware and don’t need to upgrade their software,
> in the meantime ACPI provides many methods on power management.
>
> In ARM64 world, we are aiming the same thing. Following the SBBR,SBSA specs
> to implement our UEFI and ACPI code, we think the patch set and arm-acpi
> documentation are fine , and consider it is going on the right direction, so
>
> Reviewed-by: Yi Li <phoenix.liyi@...wei.com>

Thanks a lot!

Regards,
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/