lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150106132524.GA21978@fam-t430.nay.redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 6 Jan 2015 21:25:24 +0800
From:	Fam Zheng <famz@...hat.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] virtio-scsi: Fix the race condition in
 virtscsi_handle_event

On Tue, 01/06 11:35, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 03:33:36PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > There is a race condition in virtscsi_handle_event, when many device
> > hotplug/unplug events flush in quickly.
> > 
> > The scsi_remove_device in virtscsi_handle_transport_reset may trigger
> > the BUG_ON in scsi_target_reap, because the state is altered behind it,
> > probably by scsi_scan_host of another event. I'm able to reproduce it by
> > repeatedly plugging and unplugging a scsi disk with the same lun number.
> > 
> > To make is safe, a single thread workqueue local to the module is added
> > which runs the scan work. With this change, the panic goes away.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > v2: Use a single threaded workqueue instead of mutex to serialize work
> > (Venkatesh)
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> > index c52bb5d..71b0091 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> > @@ -120,6 +120,8 @@ struct virtio_scsi {
> >  
> >  static struct kmem_cache *virtscsi_cmd_cache;
> >  static mempool_t *virtscsi_cmd_pool;
> > +static struct workqueue_struct *virtscsi_scan_wq;
> > +
> >  
> 
> Don't add two empty lines please.
> 
> >  static inline struct Scsi_Host *virtio_scsi_host(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> >  {
> > @@ -404,7 +406,7 @@ static void virtscsi_complete_event(struct virtio_scsi *vscsi, void *buf)
> >  	struct virtio_scsi_event_node *event_node = buf;
> >  
> >  	if (!vscsi->stop_events)
> > -		queue_work(system_freezable_wq, &event_node->work);
> > +		queue_work(virtscsi_scan_wq, &event_node->work);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void virtscsi_event_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > @@ -1119,6 +1121,12 @@ static int __init init(void)
> >  		pr_err("mempool_create() for virtscsi_cmd_pool failed\n");
> >  		goto error;
> >  	}
> > +	virtscsi_scan_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("virtscsi-scan");
> > +	if (!virtscsi_scan_wq) {
> > +		pr_err("create_singlethread_workqueue() for virtscsi_scan_wq failed\n");
> > +		goto error;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	ret = register_virtio_driver(&virtio_scsi_driver);
> >  	if (ret < 0)
> >  		goto error;
> > @@ -1126,6 +1134,9 @@ static int __init init(void)
> >  	return 0;
> >  
> >  error:
> > +	if (virtscsi_scan_wq) {
> > +		destroy_workqueue(virtscsi_scan_wq);
> > +	}
> >  	if (virtscsi_cmd_pool) {
> >  		mempool_destroy(virtscsi_cmd_pool);
> >  		virtscsi_cmd_pool = NULL;
> > @@ -1142,6 +1153,7 @@ static void __exit fini(void)
> >  	unregister_virtio_driver(&virtio_scsi_driver);
> >  	mempool_destroy(virtscsi_cmd_pool);
> >  	kmem_cache_destroy(virtscsi_cmd_cache);
> > +	destroy_workqueue(virtscsi_scan_wq);
> 
> 
> Please destroy in reverse order of initialization:
> between unregister_virtio_driver and mempool_destroy.

OK, will fix this. Thanks.

Fam

> 
> >  }
> >  module_init(init);
> >  module_exit(fini);
> > -- 
> > 1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ