| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 14:55:52 +0100
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Vince Hsu <vinceh@...dia.com>
Cc: Lucas Stach <dev@...xeye.de>, swarren@...dotorg.org,
gnurou@...il.com, bskeggs@...hat.com, martin.peres@...e.fr,
seven@...rod-online.com, samuel.pitoiset@...il.com,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nouveau 06/11] platform: complete the power up/down
sequence
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 08:13:01PM +0800, Vince Hsu wrote:
>
> On 01/06/2015 07:36 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >* PGP Signed by an unknown key
> >
> >On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:34:01PM +0800, Vince Hsu wrote:
> >>On 01/05/2015 11:25 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >>>>Old Signed by an unknown key
> >>>On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 10:42:58AM +0800, Vince Hsu wrote:
> >>>>On 12/24/2014 09:23 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> >>>>>Am Dienstag, den 23.12.2014, 18:39 +0800 schrieb Vince Hsu:
> >>>>>>This patch adds some missing pieces of the rail gaing/ungating sequence that
> >>>>>>can improve the stability in theory.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh@...dia.com>
> >>>>>>---
> >>>>>> drm/nouveau_platform.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>> drm/nouveau_platform.h | 3 +++
> >>>>>> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>diff --git a/drm/nouveau_platform.c b/drm/nouveau_platform.c
> >>>>>>index 68788b17a45c..527fe2358fc9 100644
> >>>>>>--- a/drm/nouveau_platform.c
> >>>>>>+++ b/drm/nouveau_platform.c
> >>>>>>@@ -25,9 +25,11 @@
> >>>>>> #include <linux/module.h>
> >>>>>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >>>>>> #include <linux/of.h>
> >>>>>>+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> >>>>>> #include <linux/reset.h>
> >>>>>> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> >>>>>> #include <soc/tegra/fuse.h>
> >>>>>>+#include <soc/tegra/mc.h>
> >>>>>> #include <soc/tegra/pmc.h>
> >>>>>> #include "nouveau_drm.h"
> >>>>>>@@ -61,6 +63,9 @@ static int nouveau_platform_power_up(struct nouveau_platform_gpu *gpu)
> >>>>>> reset_control_deassert(gpu->rst);
> >>>>>> udelay(10);
> >>>>>>+ tegra_mc_flush(gpu->mc, gpu->swgroup, false);
> >>>>>>+ udelay(10);
> >>>>>>+
> >>>>>> return 0;
> >>>>>> err_clamp:
> >>>>>>@@ -77,6 +82,14 @@ static int nouveau_platform_power_down(struct nouveau_platform_gpu *gpu)
> >>>>>> {
> >>>>>> int err;
> >>>>>>+ tegra_mc_flush(gpu->mc, gpu->swgroup, true);
> >>>>>>+ udelay(10);
> >>>>>>+
> >>>>>>+ err = tegra_powergate_gpu_set_clamping(true);
> >>>>>>+ if (err)
> >>>>>>+ return err;
> >>>>>>+ udelay(10);
> >>>>>>+
> >>>>>> reset_control_assert(gpu->rst);
> >>>>>> udelay(10);
> >>>>>>@@ -91,6 +104,31 @@ static int nouveau_platform_power_down(struct nouveau_platform_gpu *gpu)
> >>>>>> return 0;
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>>+static int nouveau_platform_get_mc(struct device *dev,
> >>>>>>+ struct tegra_mc **mc, unsigned int *swgroup)
> >>>>>Uhm, no. If this is needed this has to be a Tegra MC function and not
> >>>>>burried into nouveau code. You are using knowledge about the internal
> >>>>>workings of the MC driver here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Also this should probably only take the Dt node pointer as argument and
> >>>>>return a something like a tegra_mc_client struct that contains both the
> >>>>>MC device pointer and the swgroup so you can pass that to
> >>>>>tegra_mc_flush().
> >>>>Good idea. I will have something as below in V2 if there is no other
> >>>>comments for this.
> >>>>
> >>>>tegra_mc_client *tegra_mc_find_client(struct device_node *node)
> >>>>{
> >>>> ...
> >>>> ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(node, "nvidia,memory-client", ...)
> >>>> ...
> >>>>}
> >>>>
> >>>>There were some discussion about this few weeks ago. I'm not sure whether we
> >>>>have some conclusion/implementation though. Thierry?
> >>>>
> >>>>http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-December/308703.html
> >>>I don't think client is a good fit here. Flushing is done per SWGROUP
> >>>(on all clients of the SWGROUP). So I think we'll want something like:
> >>>
> >>> gpu@0,57000000 {
> >>> ...
> >>> nvidia,swgroup = <&mc TEGRA_SWGROUP_GPU>;
> >>> ...
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>>In the DT and return a struct tegra_mc_swgroup along the lines of:
> >>>
> >>> struct tegra_mc_client {
> >>> unsigned int id;
> >>> unsigned int swgroup;
> >>>
> >>> struct list_head list;
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> struct tegra_mc_swgroup {
> >>> struct list_head clients;
> >>> unsigned int id;
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>>Where tegra_mc_swgroup.clients is a list of struct tegra_mc_client
> >>>structures, each representing a memory client pertaining to the
> >>>SWGROUP.
> >>Based on your suggestion above, I created a struct tegra_mc_swgroup:
> >>
> >>struct tegra_mc_swgroup {
> >> unsigned int id;
> >> struct tegra_mc *mc;
> >> struct list_head head;
> >> struct list_head clients;
> >>};
> >>
> >>And added the list head in the struct tegra_mc_soc.
> >>
> >>struct tegra_mc_soc {
> >> struct tegra_mc_client *clients;
> >> unsigned int num_clients;
> >>
> >> struct tegra_mc_hr *hr_clients;
> >> unsigned int num_hr_clients;
> >Why do you still need these?
> This part is added in "[PATCH 2/11] memory: tegra: add mc flush support" and
> "[PATCH 3/11] memory: tegra: add flush operation for Tegra124 memory
> clients"
> for the hotreset registers.
Right. Perhaps calling this structure tegra_mc_hotreset and the
variables *_hotresets would be a good idea to clarify that they aren't
actually per-client but per-SWGROUP.
> >>Created one function to build the swgroup list.
> >>
> >>static int tegra_mc_build_swgroup(struct tegra_mc *mc)
> >>{
> >> int i;
> >>
> >> for (i = 0; i < mc->soc->num_clients; i++) {
> >> struct tegra_mc_swgroup *sg;
> >> bool found = false;
> >>
> >> list_for_each_entry(sg, &mc->soc->swgroups, head) {
> >> if (sg->id == mc->soc->clients[i].swgroup) {
> >> found = true;
> >> break;
> >> }
> >> }
> >Can't you use your new tegra_mc_find_swgroup() function here? That way
> >you could turn it into something slightly more readable:
> The tegra_mc_build_swgroup() is called during driver probe, and after that
> the swgroup list is established and then the tegra_mc_find_swgroup() can
> work.
But you can reuse tegra_mc_find_swgroup() instead of open-coding it to
search the partial list. The code will be exactly the same, won't it?
> > unsigned int swgroup = mc->soc->clients[i].swgroup;
> > struct tegra_mc_swgroup *group;
> >
> > group = tegra_mc_find_swgroup(mc, swgroup);
> The tegra_mc_find_swgroup() is expected to be called outside the mc driver
> and
> can only take the device node as argument because other drivers do not have
> the mc instance information unless they call tegra_mc_find_swgroup() or
> tegra_mc_find_client().
You can do that by making a low-level function that works on the struct
tegra_mc * and an unsigned int swgroup which is only used internally and
then wrap a public function around it that deals with looking up the
struct tegra_mc * and SWGROUP ID.
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists