[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201501062345.IGG21352.SQFHJOOOVtMFFL@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 23:45:29 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix RCU stall upon ENOMEM atsched_create_group().
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 10:10:45PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index ef2b104..586ee15 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -7756,8 +7756,12 @@ static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int queued)
> > void free_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg)
> > {
> > int i;
> > + struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b;
> >
> > - destroy_cfs_bandwidth(tg_cfs_bandwidth(tg));
> > + /* Check whether init_cfs_bandwidth() was called. */
> > + cfs_b = tg_cfs_bandwidth(tg);
> > + if (cfs_b->throttled_cfs_rq.next)
> > + destroy_cfs_bandwidth(cfs_b);
> >
> > for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> > if (tg->cfs_rq)
>
> This doesn't actually compile for !CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH, how about:
>
> ---
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -4005,6 +4005,10 @@ void __start_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_ba
>
> static void destroy_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
> {
> + /* init_cfs_bandwidth() was not called */
> + if (!cfs_b->throttled_cfs_rq.next)
> + return;
> +
> hrtimer_cancel(&cfs_b->period_timer);
> hrtimer_cancel(&cfs_b->slack_timer);
> }
>
I posted "#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH" version 7 minutes ago.
But I'm fine with your patch. Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists