| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1420558883-10131-30-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 17:45:06 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 29/40] alpha: macro whitespace fixes
While working on arch/alpha/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that some macros within this header are made harder to read because they
violate a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
---
arch/alpha/include/asm/uaccess.h | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/uaccess.h
index a234de7..9b0d400 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
#define get_ds() (KERNEL_DS)
#define set_fs(x) (current_thread_info()->addr_limit = (x))
-#define segment_eq(a,b) ((a).seg == (b).seg)
+#define segment_eq(a, b) ((a).seg == (b).seg)
/*
* Is a address valid? This does a straightforward calculation rather
@@ -39,13 +39,13 @@
* - AND "addr+size" doesn't have any high-bits set
* - OR we are in kernel mode.
*/
-#define __access_ok(addr,size,segment) \
+#define __access_ok(addr, size, segment) \
(((segment).seg & (addr | size | (addr+size))) == 0)
-#define access_ok(type,addr,size) \
+#define access_ok(type, addr, size) \
({ \
__chk_user_ptr(addr); \
- __access_ok(((unsigned long)(addr)),(size),get_fs()); \
+ __access_ok(((unsigned long)(addr)), (size), get_fs()); \
})
/*
@@ -60,20 +60,20 @@
* (a) re-use the arguments for side effects (sizeof/typeof is ok)
* (b) require any knowledge of processes at this stage
*/
-#define put_user(x,ptr) \
- __put_user_check((__typeof__(*(ptr)))(x),(ptr),sizeof(*(ptr)),get_fs())
-#define get_user(x,ptr) \
- __get_user_check((x),(ptr),sizeof(*(ptr)),get_fs())
+#define put_user(x, ptr) \
+ __put_user_check((__typeof__(*(ptr)))(x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)), get_fs())
+#define get_user(x, ptr) \
+ __get_user_check((x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)), get_fs())
/*
* The "__xxx" versions do not do address space checking, useful when
* doing multiple accesses to the same area (the programmer has to do the
* checks by hand with "access_ok()")
*/
-#define __put_user(x,ptr) \
- __put_user_nocheck((__typeof__(*(ptr)))(x),(ptr),sizeof(*(ptr)))
-#define __get_user(x,ptr) \
- __get_user_nocheck((x),(ptr),sizeof(*(ptr)))
+#define __put_user(x, ptr) \
+ __put_user_nocheck((__typeof__(*(ptr)))(x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)))
+#define __get_user(x, ptr) \
+ __get_user_nocheck((x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)))
/*
* The "lda %1, 2b-1b(%0)" bits are magic to get the assembler to
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@
extern void __get_user_unknown(void);
-#define __get_user_nocheck(x,ptr,size) \
+#define __get_user_nocheck(x, ptr, size) \
({ \
long __gu_err = 0; \
unsigned long __gu_val; \
@@ -100,12 +100,12 @@ extern void __get_user_unknown(void);
__gu_err; \
})
-#define __get_user_check(x,ptr,size,segment) \
+#define __get_user_check(x, ptr, size, segment) \
({ \
long __gu_err = -EFAULT; \
unsigned long __gu_val = 0; \
const __typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_addr = (ptr); \
- if (__access_ok((unsigned long)__gu_addr,size,segment)) { \
+ if (__access_ok((unsigned long)__gu_addr, size, segment)) { \
__gu_err = 0; \
switch (size) { \
case 1: __get_user_8(__gu_addr); break; \
@@ -201,31 +201,31 @@ struct __large_struct { unsigned long buf[100]; };
extern void __put_user_unknown(void);
-#define __put_user_nocheck(x,ptr,size) \
+#define __put_user_nocheck(x, ptr, size) \
({ \
long __pu_err = 0; \
__chk_user_ptr(ptr); \
switch (size) { \
- case 1: __put_user_8(x,ptr); break; \
- case 2: __put_user_16(x,ptr); break; \
- case 4: __put_user_32(x,ptr); break; \
- case 8: __put_user_64(x,ptr); break; \
+ case 1: __put_user_8(x, ptr); break; \
+ case 2: __put_user_16(x, ptr); break; \
+ case 4: __put_user_32(x, ptr); break; \
+ case 8: __put_user_64(x, ptr); break; \
default: __put_user_unknown(); break; \
} \
__pu_err; \
})
-#define __put_user_check(x,ptr,size,segment) \
+#define __put_user_check(x, ptr, size, segment) \
({ \
long __pu_err = -EFAULT; \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__pu_addr = (ptr); \
- if (__access_ok((unsigned long)__pu_addr,size,segment)) { \
+ if (__access_ok((unsigned long)__pu_addr, size, segment)) { \
__pu_err = 0; \
switch (size) { \
- case 1: __put_user_8(x,__pu_addr); break; \
- case 2: __put_user_16(x,__pu_addr); break; \
- case 4: __put_user_32(x,__pu_addr); break; \
- case 8: __put_user_64(x,__pu_addr); break; \
+ case 1: __put_user_8(x, __pu_addr); break; \
+ case 2: __put_user_16(x, __pu_addr); break; \
+ case 4: __put_user_32(x, __pu_addr); break; \
+ case 8: __put_user_64(x, __pu_addr); break; \
default: __put_user_unknown(); break; \
} \
} \
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ extern void __put_user_unknown(void);
* instead of writing: this is because they do not write to
* any memory gcc knows about, so there are no aliasing issues
*/
-#define __put_user_64(x,addr) \
+#define __put_user_64(x, addr) \
__asm__ __volatile__("1: stq %r2,%1\n" \
"2:\n" \
".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n" \
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ __asm__ __volatile__("1: stq %r2,%1\n" \
: "=r"(__pu_err) \
: "m" (__m(addr)), "rJ" (x), "0"(__pu_err))
-#define __put_user_32(x,addr) \
+#define __put_user_32(x, addr) \
__asm__ __volatile__("1: stl %r2,%1\n" \
"2:\n" \
".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n" \
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ __asm__ __volatile__("1: stl %r2,%1\n" \
#ifdef __alpha_bwx__
/* Those lucky bastards with ev56 and later CPUs can do byte/word moves. */
-#define __put_user_16(x,addr) \
+#define __put_user_16(x, addr) \
__asm__ __volatile__("1: stw %r2,%1\n" \
"2:\n" \
".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n" \
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ __asm__ __volatile__("1: stw %r2,%1\n" \
: "=r"(__pu_err) \
: "m"(__m(addr)), "rJ"(x), "0"(__pu_err))
-#define __put_user_8(x,addr) \
+#define __put_user_8(x, addr) \
__asm__ __volatile__("1: stb %r2,%1\n" \
"2:\n" \
".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n" \
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ __asm__ __volatile__("1: stb %r2,%1\n" \
/* Unfortunately, we can't get an unaligned access trap for the sub-word
write, so we have to do a general unaligned operation. */
-#define __put_user_16(x,addr) \
+#define __put_user_16(x, addr) \
{ \
long __pu_tmp1, __pu_tmp2, __pu_tmp3, __pu_tmp4; \
__asm__ __volatile__( \
@@ -308,13 +308,13 @@ __asm__ __volatile__("1: stb %r2,%1\n" \
" .long 4b - .\n" \
" lda $31, 5b-4b(%0)\n" \
".previous" \
- : "=r"(__pu_err), "=&r"(__pu_tmp1), \
- "=&r"(__pu_tmp2), "=&r"(__pu_tmp3), \
+ : "=r"(__pu_err), "=&r"(__pu_tmp1), \
+ "=&r"(__pu_tmp2), "=&r"(__pu_tmp3), \
"=&r"(__pu_tmp4) \
: "r"(addr), "r"((unsigned long)(x)), "0"(__pu_err)); \
}
-#define __put_user_8(x,addr) \
+#define __put_user_8(x, addr) \
{ \
long __pu_tmp1, __pu_tmp2; \
__asm__ __volatile__( \
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ __asm__ __volatile__("1: stb %r2,%1\n" \
" .long 2b - .\n" \
" lda $31, 3b-2b(%0)\n" \
".previous" \
- : "=r"(__pu_err), \
+ : "=r"(__pu_err), \
"=&r"(__pu_tmp1), "=&r"(__pu_tmp2) \
: "r"((unsigned long)(x)), "r"(addr), "0"(__pu_err)); \
}
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ __copy_tofrom_user_nocheck(void *to, const void *from, long len)
: "=r" (__cu_len), "=r" (__cu_from), "=r" (__cu_to)
: __module_address(__copy_user)
"0" (__cu_len), "1" (__cu_from), "2" (__cu_to)
- : "$1","$2","$3","$4","$5","$28","memory");
+ : "$1", "$2", "$3", "$4", "$5", "$28", "memory");
return __cu_len;
}
@@ -379,15 +379,15 @@ __copy_tofrom_user(void *to, const void *from, long len, const void __user *vali
return len;
}
-#define __copy_to_user(to,from,n) \
+#define __copy_to_user(to, from, n) \
({ \
__chk_user_ptr(to); \
- __copy_tofrom_user_nocheck((__force void *)(to),(from),(n)); \
+ __copy_tofrom_user_nocheck((__force void *)(to), (from), (n)); \
})
-#define __copy_from_user(to,from,n) \
+#define __copy_from_user(to, from, n) \
({ \
__chk_user_ptr(from); \
- __copy_tofrom_user_nocheck((to),(__force void *)(from),(n)); \
+ __copy_tofrom_user_nocheck((to), (__force void *)(from), (n)); \
})
#define __copy_to_user_inatomic __copy_to_user
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ __clear_user(void __user *to, long len)
: "=r"(__cl_len), "=r"(__cl_to)
: __module_address(__do_clear_user)
"0"(__cl_len), "1"(__cl_to)
- : "$1","$2","$3","$4","$5","$28","memory");
+ : "$1", "$2", "$3", "$4", "$5", "$28", "memory");
return __cl_len;
}
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists