linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] perf/x86/intel: Perform rotation on Intel CQM RMIDs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150106173641.GI3337@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Tue, 6 Jan 2015 18:36:41 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Kanaka Juvva <kanaka.d.juvva@...el.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] perf/x86/intel: Perform rotation on Intel CQM
 RMIDs

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 09:15:11PM +0000, Matt Fleming wrote:
> @@ -417,17 +857,38 @@ static u64 intel_cqm_event_count(struct perf_event *event)
>  	if (!cqm_group_leader(event))
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	on_each_cpu_mask(&cqm_cpumask, __intel_cqm_event_count, &rr, 1);
> +	/*
> +	 * Notice that we don't perform the reading of an RMID
> +	 * atomically, because we can't hold a spin lock across the
> +	 * IPIs.
> +	 *
> +	 * Speculatively perform the read, since @event might be
> +	 * assigned a different (possibly invalid) RMID while we're
> +	 * busying performing the IPI calls. It's therefore necessary to
> +	 * check @event's RMID afterwards, and if it has changed,
> +	 * discard the result of the read.
> +	 */
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cache_lock, flags);
> +	rr.rmid = event->hw.cqm_rmid;
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cache_lock, flags);

You don't actually have to hold the lock here, only ACCESS_ONCE() or
whatever newfangled thing replaced that.

> +
> +	if (!__rmid_valid(rr.rmid))
> +		goto out;
>  
> -	local64_set(&event->count, atomic64_read(&rr.value));
> +	on_each_cpu_mask(&cqm_cpumask, __intel_cqm_event_count, &rr, 1);
>  
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cache_lock, flags);
> +	if (event->hw.cqm_rmid == rr.rmid)
> +		local64_set(&event->count, atomic64_read(&rr.value));
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cache_lock, flags);

Here you do indeed need the lock as its more than a single op :-)

> +out:
>  	return __perf_event_count(event);
>  }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/