[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150106205454.GA22067@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 07:54:54 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Giel van Schijndel <me@...tis.eu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE..." <x86@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
Rahul Bedarkar <rahulbedarkar89@...il.com>,
Thomas Pugliese <thomas.pugliese@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
"open list:CRYPTO API" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:CERTIFIED WIRELES..." <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:COMMON INTERNET F..." <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:COMMON INTERNET F..."
<samba-technical@...ts.samba.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use memzero_explicit to clear local buffers
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 08:42:26PM +0100, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>
> Question: are you sure the compiler won't optimize the call to memset(0)
> way if it's immediately followed by kfree()?
Yes it won't be optimised away. However, you could use kzfree.
> Another actually does change a stack-allocated buffer, I'll split that
> one off right away.
OK.
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists