lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150106132102.65ad5988fc566357450e3d65@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 6 Jan 2015 13:21:02 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
	<kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: kgdb-next not pushed to Linus for 3.19

On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 10:57:42 -0800 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 18:54 +0000, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > Hi Jason
> > 
> > I'm trying to figure out what to do with my long-outstanding kgdb/kdb
> > patches in preparation for the 3.20 merge window.
> > 
> > As of now I have five pending patch sets some of which are well over six
> > months old (and none have nay outstanding review comments).
> > 
> > When I raised this with you a couple of months ago, two of the patch
> > sets did land in your kgdb-next tree. However nothing seems to have
> > happened since then and I couldn't find any messages from you during the
> > 3.19 merge window.
> > 
> > I'm afraid I don't know what else I need to do to progress things.
> > 
> > I do plan to do routine rebasing and resending of my patchsets but,
> > based on the past experience, that seems unlikely to be enough to get
> > the code delivered in 3.20.
> > 
> > Do you think I would be better sending these patches via someone else?
> > In any case, advice would be very welcome.
> 
> Andrew?
> 
> I think Daniel's kgdb patches are bug fixes.
> 
> Can you please pick them up?

yup.  Merging patches which are already in -next is a bit of a pain,
but I'll cope.

Daniel, can you please resend everything in a nice clean coherent
stream?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ