[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUpR6ZCBSXdbY232inK=LaXLK0LAssqUt+r8DAn9=xjJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 13:34:56 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
ilya.enkovich@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.19 3/3] x86, mpx: Change the MPX enable/disable API to arch_prctl
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>> Given that it doesn't seen to have been committed yet, I'm not too
>> worried about compatibility. And "prctl (43)" doesn't actually seem a
>> whole lot better than "syscall(SYS_arch_prctl, ARCH_ENABLE_MPX, 0)"
>
> This would actually fail with the EINVAL change you requested.
>
So the libmpx code needs to change anyway, then, right? I really
don't think we should accept garbage in the extra prctl slots just
because uncommitted code somewhere fails to initialize them.
--Andy
>> (preprocessor macros ftw!). But I don't feel that strongly about this
>> point.
>
> -Andi
--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists