[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150106232025.GA32569@amd>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 00:20:25 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Mark Seaborn <mseaborn@...omium.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, luto@...capital.net
Subject: Re: DRAM unreliable under specific access patern
On Mon 2015-01-05 19:23:29, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > In the meantime, I created test that actually uses physical memory,
> > 8MB apart, as described in some footnote. It is attached. It should
> > work, but it needs boot with specific config options and specific
> > kernel parameters.
>
> Why not just use hugepages. You know the alignment guarantees for 1GB
> pages and that means you don't even need to be root
>
> In fact - should we be disabling 1GB huge page support by default at this
> point, at least on non ECC boxes ?
Actually, I could not get my test code to run; and as code from
https://github.com/mseaborn/rowhammer-test
reproduces issue for me, I stopped trying. I could not get it to
damage memory of other process than itself (but that should be
possible), I guess that's next thing to try.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists