linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.14 17/52] dm cache: dirty flag was mistakenly being cleared when promoting via overwrite

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150107020557.946310606@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue,  6 Jan 2015 18:06:45 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Joe Thornber <ejt@...hat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.14 17/52] dm cache: dirty flag was mistakenly being cleared when promoting via overwrite

3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Joe Thornber <ejt@...hat.com>

commit 1e32134a5a404e80bfb47fad8a94e9bbfcbdacc5 upstream.

If the incoming bio is a WRITE and completely covers a block then we
don't bother to do any copying for a promotion operation.  Once this is
done the cache block and origin block will be different, so we need to
set it to 'dirty'.

Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c |   10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
@@ -946,10 +946,14 @@ static void migration_success_post_commi
 		}
 
 	} else {
-		clear_dirty(cache, mg->new_oblock, mg->cblock);
-		if (mg->requeue_holder)
+		if (mg->requeue_holder) {
+			clear_dirty(cache, mg->new_oblock, mg->cblock);
 			cell_defer(cache, mg->new_ocell, true);
-		else {
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * The block was promoted via an overwrite, so it's dirty.
+			 */
+			set_dirty(cache, mg->new_oblock, mg->cblock);
 			bio_endio(mg->new_ocell->holder, 0);
 			cell_defer(cache, mg->new_ocell, false);
 		}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/