lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:02:07 +0800
From:	"Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>
To:	"'Wang Nan'" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc:	<linux@....linux.org.uk>, "'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	<anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<ananth@...ibm.com>, <dave.long@...aro.org>, <tixy@...aro.org>,
	<lizefan@...wei.com>,
	"'linux-kernel'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 09/11] kprobes: core logic of eraly kprobes

> >>
> >> +struct early_kprobe_slot {
> >> +	struct optimized_kprobe op;
> >> +};
> >> +
> > [...]
> >>
> >>  /* Free optimized instructions and optimized_kprobe */
> >> +static int ek_free_early_kprobe(struct early_kprobe_slot *slot);
> >
> > [2] How is it implemented? In subsequent patches?
> >
> 
> It is implemented using macro. Please see patch 7/11 and
> 
> DEFINE_EKPROBE_ALLOC_OPS(struct early_kprobe_slot, early_kprobe, static);
>
What is the reason that it is listed in C file, given that it is done in H already?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ