linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] wireless extensions should default to Y

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1420628802.3407.4.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:	Wed, 07 Jan 2015 12:06:42 +0100
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	jikos@...e.cz, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	davem@...emloft.net, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless extensions should default to Y

On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 12:03 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2015-01-07 11:41:55, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 11:19 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Do we need following patch on top of
> > > 24a0aa212ee2dbe44360288684478d76a8e20a0a revert?
> > > 
> > > I updated kernel today, and (probably because extensions were not
> > > selectable before), the default choice was "N", which is wrong:
> > > oldconfig should result in compatible choices being made, for example
> > > to help bisect.
> > 
> > I don't believe we need this. It has been defaulting to N for a long
> > time, it's just that it got thrown out of your config due to building
> > inbetween the patch and its revert. Had you built only before and after
> > that wouldn't be an issue.
> 
> Well, I clearly hit the issue. If someone had _not_ build in between,
> the "default y" does not change anything for him, as he will not be
> asked thequestion. If someone starts config from scratch, Y is the
> safe answer.

We've long stated that if really starting from scratch it's the wrong
thing to do and had a default N, so I don't really know why we'd revert
that only to make a short period of bisect slightly happier?

I really don't want to merge this patch and encourage more people to
build with wext enabled.

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/