lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 11:04:43 -0600 From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com> To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> CC: <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, Purcareata Bogdan <b43198@...escale.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de> Subject: Re: [RFC] PPC: MPIC: necessary readback after EOI? On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 15:44 +0100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 12:10 -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > > It would have been nice if a code comment explained why it was doing the > > readback... I don't see any particular need to wait for EOI completion > > here (unlike when masking). > > The EOI is what causes the MPIC to drop it's EE output to the CPU, if the > EOI is processed too slowly & asynchronously (posted write + 33Mhz MPIC) > we observe cases of spurrious interrupts. We had some macs basically getting > a spurrious irq for every MPIC interrupts... Shouldn't reading INTACK be what causes the MPIC to drop its EE output? -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists