[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54AD731F.3080408@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 09:55:43 -0800
From: Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Jungseung Lee <js07.lee@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/module.c: Mark module state before set RO and
NX regions
On 1/6/2015 8:16 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Jungseung Lee <js07.lee@...il.com> writes:
>> In some architectures like arm/arm64, set_memory_*() check module address
>> and state as well. Mark module state before set RO and NX regions for
>> the routine is passed.
>>
>> It will fix wrong RO/NX protection for loadable kernel modules on arm/arm64.
>
> This partially reverts commit 4982223e51e8ea9d09bb33c8323b5ec1877b2b51
> Author: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> Date: Wed May 14 10:54:19 2014 +0930
>
> module: set nx before marking module MODULE_STATE_COMING.
>
> Laura Abbott (CC'd) was looking at an alternative fix for this. Laura?
>
> Thanks,
> Rusty.
>
Yes, my proposal was to stop using is_module_address and just bounds
check against the module ranges[1]. I got bogged down with other
tasks and hadn't submitted a patch for review yet.
Thanks,
Laura
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-December/311574.html
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists