[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150108110931.GA8568@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 22:09:31 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
Cc: 'Quentin Gouchet' <quentin.gouchet@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] crypto: AF_ALG: add AEAD support
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 04:51:38PM +0100, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>
> + if (!aead_writable(sk)) {
> + /*
> + * If there is more data to be expected, but we cannot
> + * write more data, forcefully define that we do not
> + * expect more data to invoke the AEAD operation. This
> + * prevents a deadlock in user space.
> + */
> + ctx->more = 0;
We should return EMSGSIZE here. Also we should clear out the
existing data so that the socket may be reused again.
> + ctx->more = msg->msg_flags & MSG_MORE;
> + if (!ctx->more && !aead_sufficient_data(ctx))
> + err = -EINVAL;
Ditto, we should discard the data that's queued up. Also perhaps
use EBADMSG instead of EINVAL.
> + /*
> + * Require exactly one IOV block as the AEAD operation is a one shot
> + * due to the authentication tag.
> + */
> + if (msg->msg_iter.nr_segs != 1)
> + return -ENOMSG;
Why does the receive buffer have to be contiguous?
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists