[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150108145210.GY2915@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 15:52:10 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCHSET 00/37] perf tools: Speed-up perf report by using
multi thread (v1)
> > Isn't it fast enough to have a single thread that pre scans
> > the events (perhaps with some single-thread optimizations
> > like vectorization), and then load balances the work to
> > a thread pool?
>
> I don't understand it. Could you please elaborate it?
Have a thread pool. Then there is a single thread which pre-processes
events and puts them into queues, which are then processed in parallel
by the threads in the thread pool.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists