linux-kernel - Re: [Regression][v3.17][3.18][3.19-rc3] drm/radeon: re-enable dpm by default on BTC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 08 Jan 2015 11:12:30 -0500
From:	Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
To:	"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>
CC:	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@....com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Regression][v3.17][3.18][3.19-rc3] drm/radeon: re-enable dpm
 by default on BTC

On 01/07/2015 09:51 PM, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joseph Salisbury [mailto:joseph.salisbury@...onical.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 5:51 PM
>> To: Deucher, Alexander
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org; LKML; Koenig, Christian; David Airlie; dri-devel
>> Subject: [Regression][v3.17][3.18][3.19-rc3] drm/radeon: re-enable dpm by
>> default on BTC
>>
>> Hi Alexander,
>>
>> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0].  After a kernel
>> bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug:
>>
>> commit c08abf11900e19b14dd3a0cc3d105bd74519cd18
>> Author: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
>> Date:   Mon Jul 14 12:01:40 2014 -0400
>>
>>     drm/radeon: re-enable dpm by default on BTC
>>
>> The regression was introduced as of v3.17-rc1 and still exists in
>> current mainline.  It has also made it's way into the stable releases.
>>
>> I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author.  Do
>> you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue,
>> or would it be best to submit a revert request?
>>
> Does revering b2dccf24e77 help?  I'd hate to revert this patch because it disables power management for a whole family of chips.  If it doesn't help I'd prefer to just add a quirk to disable it for the specific problematic board.
We'll test and let you know.  Thanks for the feedback, Alex!


>
> Alex
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> [0] http://pad.lv/1386534

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/