[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150108163224.GU12302@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 16:32:24 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
vincent.weaver@...ne.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert 9fc2105aeaaf56b0cf75296a84702d0f9e64437b to fix
pyaudio (and probably more)
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 10:44:53AM -0500, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2015, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> > It's not a regression - yet. No one has shown that userspace has broken
> > according to the definition of the first quote above, and that's the
> > whole point.
>
> How much does one have to regress before it is a problem? I have two
> projects I've worked on that "broke" due to this issue.
If it's something which worked before and fails after, that's enough.
> They were minor breakages though.
>
> The "linux_logo" userspace sysinfo tool broke to the extent that it
> was parsing for the bogomips string in /proc/cpuinfo and printed poorly
> formatted and/or corrupted text info to screen when it couldn't find it.
>
> The "PAPI" library had some really ancient (and poorly
> thought-out) fallback code that would try to estimate MHz from bogomips
> if a MHz value was not available via the traditional methods. This
> failed after the change too, but not many people use PAPI on ARM so it
> wasn't that big an issue.
>
> I noticed these problems early, even before the change hit mainline.
> But when I complained I was told in no uncertain terms that the ARM
> maintainers were tired of hearing about bogomips issues and nothing
> could be done to stop the change from getting in.
Sorry about that.
However, I'm having a hard time finding your report. Do you have a
message id for the report?
For the record, I have no knowledge of this report having been made.
My linux-arm-kernel web archives bring up nothing either.
My mailbox record going back to the start of 2013 (which includes all
linux-arm-kernel mailing list traffic and any traffic to _this_ address,
and covers six months before the commit happened), I only have messages
with these subject lines authored by you:
2013:
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ARM ATTEND] catching up on exploit mitigations
Subject: Re: NSA310 + DT
2014:
Subject: Re: CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS and bcm2835_defconfig
Subject: Re: CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS and bcm2835_defconfig
Subject: Re: CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS and bcm2835_defconfig
Subject: [bisected] broken make-kpkg kernel build in 3.15-rc1
Subject: Re: [bisected] broken make-kpkg kernel build in 3.15-rc1
Subject: Re: [bisected] broken make-kpkg kernel build in 3.15-rc1
Subject: Re: [bisected] broken make-kpkg kernel build in 3.15-rc1
Subject: Re: [bisected] broken make-kpkg kernel build in 3.15-rc1
Subject: Re: [bisected] broken make-kpkg kernel build in 3.15-rc1
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf/ARM: Use common PMU interrupt disabled code
For the thread where the offending patch was posted in 2013, my mailbox
gives me:
4963 Jun 20 Will Deacon ( 36) [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: Remove any correlatio
4964 Jun 20 Will Deacon ( 67) ├─>[PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: delay: don't bothe
4965 Jun 20 Will Deacon ( 50) ├─>[PATCH v2 2/2] init: calibrate: don't
4966 Jun 20 Nicolas Pitre ( 27) ├─>Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: Remove any cor
4967 Jun 21 Will Deacon ( 29) │ └─>
4968 Jun 21 Marc Zyngier ( 27) └─>
Did you copy linux-arm-kernel with your report?
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists