[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54AEC470.50509@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 23:24:56 +0530
From: Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: "tixy@...aro.org" <tixy@...aro.org>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"ananth@...ibm.com" <ananth@...ibm.com>,
"sandeepa.prabhu@...aro.org" <sandeepa.prabhu@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
"masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com" <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
"wcohen@...hat.com" <wcohen@...hat.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 8/8] ARM64: Add uprobe support
On Thursday 08 January 2015 10:33 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 03:21:24PM +0000, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>> This patch adds support for uprobe on ARM64 architecture.
>>
>> Unit test for following has been done so far and they have been found
>> working
>> 1. Normal instruction, which can be probed like sub, ldr, add etc.
>> 2. Instructions which can be simulated like ret.
>> 3. uretprobe
>
> I'm assuming that means you don't support compat (AArch32) tasks with this?
Hummm.. Yes, compat not yet supported.
I will come back on this.
~Pratyush
> How do you enforce that?
>
> Will
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists