[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54AEC5D4.2040800@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 13:00:52 -0500
From: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
To: "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>
CC: "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Regression][v3.17][3.18][3.19-rc3] drm/radeon: re-enable dpm
by default on BTC
On 01/08/2015 12:48 PM, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joseph Salisbury [mailto:joseph.salisbury@...onical.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 11:26 AM
>> To: Deucher, Alexander
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org; LKML; Koenig, Christian; David Airlie; dri-devel
>> Subject: Re: [Regression][v3.17][3.18][3.19-rc3] drm/radeon: re-enable dpm
>> by default on BTC
>>
>> On 01/07/2015 09:51 PM, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Joseph Salisbury [mailto:joseph.salisbury@...onical.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 5:51 PM
>>>> To: Deucher, Alexander
>>>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org; LKML; Koenig, Christian; David Airlie; dri-devel
>>>> Subject: [Regression][v3.17][3.18][3.19-rc3] drm/radeon: re-enable dpm
>> by
>>>> default on BTC
>>>>
>>>> Hi Alexander,
>>>>
>>>> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel
>>>> bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug:
>>>>
>>>> commit c08abf11900e19b14dd3a0cc3d105bd74519cd18
>>>> Author: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
>>>> Date: Mon Jul 14 12:01:40 2014 -0400
>>>>
>>>> drm/radeon: re-enable dpm by default on BTC
>>>>
>>>> The regression was introduced as of v3.17-rc1 and still exists in
>>>> current mainline. It has also made it's way into the stable releases.
>>>>
>>>> I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author. Do
>>>> you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue,
>>>> or would it be best to submit a revert request?
>>>>
>>> Does revering b2dccf24e77 help? I'd hate to revert this patch because it
>> disables power management for a whole family of chips. If it doesn't help I'd
>> prefer to just add a quirk to disable it for the specific problematic board.
>> Commit b2dccf24e77 was added to mainline as of v3.18-rc1 and was not
>> cc'd to stable. We are also seeing this issue in the 3.13.y stable
>> kernel, which does not have commit b2dccf24e77 applied. However, we can
>> test reverting it in mainline?
> Nope. Won't make a difference. The attached patch adds a quirk list for dpm which will fix the issue for the affected boards.
>
> Alex
Great. Thanks so much for the assistance, Alex! I'll have the patch
tested and post some feedback.
>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Joe
>>>>
>>>> [0] http://pad.lv/1386534
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists