linux-kernel - Re: scsi: non atomic allocation in mempool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 8 Jan 2015 12:31:36 -0800
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	bvanassche <bvanassche@....org>, hare <hare@...e.de>,
	jbottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: scsi: non atomic allocation in mempool_alloc in atomic context

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:29 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 07:55:42PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> I'm seeing the same splats... what tree I can pull the fix from ?
>
> None so far.  I'll still need a review to apply it to the scsi-queue tree.

applied it manually and warning is gone. It used to
spam a lot of them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/