[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKgyU0BF5XW1PU9hvCiPu1rz1SPPKAvmuQ+GenfKvUkfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 16:22:38 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Hector Marco Gisbert <hecmargi@....es>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ismael Ripoll Ripoll <iripoll@...ca.upv.es>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATH] Fix stack randomization on x86_64 bit
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Hector Marco Gisbert <hecmargi@....es> wrote:
>
> [PATH] Fix stack randomization on x86_64 bit
s/PATH/PATCH/
>
> The issue is that the stack for processes is not properly randomized on 64
> bit
> architectures due to an integer overflow.
>
>
> The affected function is randomize_stack_top() in file "fs/binfmt_elf.c":
>
> static unsigned long randomize_stack_top(unsigned long stack_top)
> {
> unsigned int random_variable = 0;
>
> if ((current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE) &&
> !(current->personality & ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE)) {
> random_variable = get_random_int() & STACK_RND_MASK;
> random_variable <<= PAGE_SHIFT;
> }
> #ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP
> return PAGE_ALIGN(stack_top) + random_variable;
> #else
> return PAGE_ALIGN(stack_top) - random_variable;
> #endif
> }
>
>
> Note that, it declares the "random_variable" variable as "unsigned int".
> Since
> the result of the shifting operation between STACK_RND_MASK (which is
> 0x3fffff on
> x86_64, 22 bits) and PAGE_SHIFT (which is 12 on x86_64):
>
> random_variable <<= PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> then the two leftmost bits are dropped when storing the result in the
> "random_variable". This variable shall be at least 34 bits long to hold the
> (22+12) result.
>
> These two dropped bits have an impact on the entropy of process stack.
> Concretely, the total stack entropy is reduced by four: from 2^28 to 2^30
> (One
> fourth of expected entropy).
>
> This patch restores back the entropy by correcting the types involved in the
> operations in the functions randomize_stack_top() and
> stack_maxrandom_size().
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Hector Marco-Gisbert <hecmargi@....es>
> Signed-off-by: Ismael Ripoll <iripoll@....es>
Good catch!
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
-Kees
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
> index 919b912..df4552b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -35,12 +35,12 @@ struct va_alignment __read_mostly va_align = {
> .flags = -1,
> };
>
> -static unsigned int stack_maxrandom_size(void)
> +static unsigned long stack_maxrandom_size(void)
> {
> - unsigned int max = 0;
> + unsigned long max = 0;
> if ((current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE) &&
> !(current->personality & ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE)) {
> - max = ((-1U) & STACK_RND_MASK) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> + max = ((-1UL) & STACK_RND_MASK) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> }
>
> return max;
> diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> index d8fc060..ee668b4 100644
> --- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> +++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> @@ -554,11 +554,11 @@ out:
>
> static unsigned long randomize_stack_top(unsigned long stack_top)
> {
> - unsigned int random_variable = 0;
> + unsigned long random_variable = 0;
>
> if ((current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE) &&
> !(current->personality & ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE)) {
> - random_variable = get_random_int() & STACK_RND_MASK;
> + random_variable = (unsigned long) get_random_int() &
> STACK_RND_MASK;
> random_variable <<= PAGE_SHIFT;
> }
> #ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP
>
>
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists