[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04d401d02aeb$50c519c0$f24f4d40$@alibaba-inc.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:32:14 +0800
From: "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>
To: "'Wang Nan'" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: <linux@....linux.org.uk>, "'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@...hat.com>,
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
<anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<ananth@...ibm.com>, <dave.long@...aro.org>, <tixy@...aro.org>,
<lizefan@...wei.com>,
"'linux-kernel'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 09/11] kprobes: core logic of eraly kprobes
>
> This macro defines an array and a bitmap, not only declare them. In addition,
> the functions defined by it are used only in this specific .c file.
>
> If there are not only one .c files use it, I think patch 7 can be improved:
>
> #define DEFINE_EKPROBE_AREA(__t, __static) \
> __static __t __ek_##__name##_slots[NR_EARLY_KPROBES_SLOTS]; \
> __static unsigned long __ek_##__name##_bitmap[EARLY_KPROBES_BITMAP_SZ];
>
> #define DEFINE_EKPROBE_ALLOC_OPS(__t, __name, __static) \
> DEFINE_EKPROBE_AREA(__t, __static) \
> __DEFINE_EKPROBE_ALLOC_OPS(__t, __name) \
> static inline __t *ek_alloc_##__name(void) \
> { \
> ...
>
> In .h file(s):
> DEFINE_EKPROBE_ALLOC_OPS(struct early_kprobe_slot, early_kprobe, extern)
>
> In .c file:
> DEFINE_EKPROBE_AREA(__t, )
>
> What do you think?
>
Looks like rocket science;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists