linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] vmscan: force scan offline memory cgroups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150109094535.GB7596@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:	Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:45:35 +0100
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vmscan: force scan offline memory cgroups

On Fri 09-01-15 11:09:43, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> Since commit b2052564e66d ("mm: memcontrol: continue cache reclaim from
> offlined groups") pages charged to a memory cgroup are not reparented
> when the cgroup is removed. Instead, they are supposed to be reclaimed
> in a regular way, along with pages accounted to online memory cgroups.
> 
> However, an lruvec of an offline memory cgroup will sooner or later get
> so small that it will be scanned only at low scan priorities (see
> get_scan_count()). Therefore, if there are enough reclaimable pages in
> big lruvecs, pages accounted to offline memory cgroups will never be
> scanned at all, wasting memory.
> 
> Fix this by unconditionally forcing scanning dead lruvecs from kswapd.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>

Thanks!

> ---
> Changes in v2:
>  - code style fixes (Johannes)
> 
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h |    6 ++++++
>  mm/memcontrol.c            |   14 ++++++++++++++
>  mm/vmscan.c                |    8 ++++++--
>  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 76b4084b8d08..68f3b44ef27c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_iter_break(struct mem_cgroup *, struct mem_cgroup *);
>   * For memory reclaim.
>   */
>  int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct lruvec *lruvec);
> +bool mem_cgroup_lruvec_online(struct lruvec *lruvec);
>  int mem_cgroup_select_victim_node(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
>  unsigned long mem_cgroup_get_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list);
>  void mem_cgroup_update_lru_size(struct lruvec *, enum lru_list, int);
> @@ -266,6 +267,11 @@ mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct lruvec *lruvec)
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> +bool mem_cgroup_lruvec_online(struct lruvec *lruvec)
> +{
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  static inline unsigned long
>  mem_cgroup_get_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru)
>  {
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index bfa1a849d113..67c936bbaa13 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1367,6 +1367,20 @@ int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct lruvec *lruvec)
>  	return inactive * inactive_ratio < active;
>  }
>  
> +bool mem_cgroup_lruvec_online(struct lruvec *lruvec)
> +{
> +	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
> +	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> +
> +	if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> +		return true;
> +
> +	mz = container_of(lruvec, struct mem_cgroup_per_zone, lruvec);
> +	memcg = mz->memcg;
> +
> +	return !!(memcg->css.flags & CSS_ONLINE);
> +}
> +
>  #define mem_cgroup_from_counter(counter, member)	\
>  	container_of(counter, struct mem_cgroup, member)
>  
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index e29f411b38ac..38173d9a2a87 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1935,8 +1935,12 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, int swappiness,
>  	 * latencies, so it's better to scan a minimum amount there as
>  	 * well.
>  	 */
> -	if (current_is_kswapd() && !zone_reclaimable(zone))
> -		force_scan = true;
> +	if (current_is_kswapd()) {
> +		if (!zone_reclaimable(zone))
> +			force_scan = true;
> +		if (!mem_cgroup_lruvec_online(lruvec))
> +			force_scan = true;
> +	}
>  	if (!global_reclaim(sc))
>  		force_scan = true;
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/