[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1420799154.4160.19.camel@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:25:54 +0000
From: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org>
To: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
lizefan@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 08/11] ARM: kprobes: enable OPTPROBES for ARM 32
On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 14:37 +0800, Wang Nan wrote:
> This patch introduce kprobeopt for ARM 32.
>
> Limitations:
> - Currently only kernel compiled with ARM ISA is supported.
>
> - Offset between probe point and optinsn slot must not larger than
> 32MiB. Masami Hiramatsu suggests replacing 2 words, it will make
> things complex. Futher patch can make such optimization.
>
> Kprobe opt on ARM is relatively simpler than kprobe opt on x86 because
> ARM instruction is always 4 bytes aligned and 4 bytes long. This patch
> replace probed instruction by a 'b', branch to trampoline code and then
> calls optimized_callback(). optimized_callback() calls opt_pre_handler()
> to execute kprobe handler. It also emulate/simulate replaced instruction.
>
> When unregistering kprobe, the deferred manner of unoptimizer may leave
> branch instruction before optimizer is called. Different from x86_64,
> which only copy the probed insn after optprobe_template_end and
> reexecute them, this patch call singlestep to emulate/simulate the insn
> directly. Futher patch can optimize this behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
> Cc: Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <tixy@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <tixy@...aro.org>
> Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> ---
[...]
> +asm (
> + ".global optprobe_template_entry\n"
> + "optprobe_template_entry:\n"
> + ".global optprobe_template_sub_sp\n"
> + "optprobe_template_sub_sp:"
> + " sub sp, sp, #0xff\n"
> + " stmia sp, {r0 - r14} \n"
> + ".global optprobe_template_add_sp\n"
> + "optprobe_template_add_sp:"
> + " add r3, sp, #0xff\n"
> + " str r3, [sp, #52]\n"
> + " mrs r4, cpsr\n"
> + " str r4, [sp, #64]\n"
> + " mov r1, sp\n"
> + " ldr r0, 1f\n"
> + " ldr r2, 2f\n"
> + /*
> + * AEABI requires an 8-bytes alignment stack. If
> + * SP % 8 != 0 (SP % 4 == 0 should be ensured),
> + * alloc more bytes here.
> + */
> + " and r4, sp, #4\n"
> + " sub sp, sp, r4\n"
> +#if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 5
> + " blx r2\n"
> +#else
> + " mov lr, pc\n"
> + " bx r2\n"
I think the BX instruction is not supported for ARMv4 chips that don't
have Thumb support (e.g. SA110), at least an old ARM ARM I have says BX
is supported on "Version 5 and above, and T variants of version 4".
Though building assabet_defconfig with kprobes enabled doesn't produce
an error for the BX instruction (!?)
To be safe I would be tempted to use "mov pc, r2" instead. Again, if you
agree, I'll change this in the patch in the branch I'm putting together.
[...]
--
Tixy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists