linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.12 25/78] drm/i915: Unlock panel even when LVDS is disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <aa4e539e52e4a364cc599b69240c473fd6e9f445.1420799385.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date:	Fri,  9 Jan 2015 11:31:34 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	Alexey Orishko <alexey.orishko@...il.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
	Francois Tigeot <ftigeot@...fpond.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 25/78] drm/i915: Unlock panel even when LVDS is disabled

From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit b0616c5306b342ceca07044dbc4f917d95c4f825 upstream.

Otherwise we'll have backtraces in assert_panel_unlocked because the
BIOS locks the register. In the reporter's case this regression was
introduced in

commit c31407a3672aaebb4acddf90944a114fa5c8af7b
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Thu Oct 18 21:07:01 2012 +0100

    drm/i915: Add no-lvds quirk for Supermicro X7SPA-H

Reported-by: Alexey Orishko <alexey.orishko@...il.com>
Cc: Alexey Orishko <alexey.orishko@...il.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Francois Tigeot <ftigeot@...fpond.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
Tested-by: Alexey Orishko <alexey.orishko@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
index 667f2117e1d9..e5473daab676 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
@@ -934,6 +934,17 @@ void intel_lvds_init(struct drm_device *dev)
 	int pipe;
 	u8 pin;
 
+	/*
+	 * Unlock registers and just leave them unlocked. Do this before
+	 * checking quirk lists to avoid bogus WARNINGs.
+	 */
+	if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
+		I915_WRITE(PCH_PP_CONTROL,
+			   I915_READ(PCH_PP_CONTROL) | PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS);
+	} else {
+		I915_WRITE(PP_CONTROL,
+			   I915_READ(PP_CONTROL) | PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS);
+	}
 	if (!intel_lvds_supported(dev))
 		return;
 
@@ -1113,17 +1124,6 @@ out:
 	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("detected %s-link lvds configuration\n",
 		      lvds_encoder->is_dual_link ? "dual" : "single");
 
-	/*
-	 * Unlock registers and just
-	 * leave them unlocked
-	 */
-	if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
-		I915_WRITE(PCH_PP_CONTROL,
-			   I915_READ(PCH_PP_CONTROL) | PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS);
-	} else {
-		I915_WRITE(PP_CONTROL,
-			   I915_READ(PP_CONTROL) | PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS);
-	}
 	lvds_connector->lid_notifier.notifier_call = intel_lid_notify;
 	if (acpi_lid_notifier_register(&lvds_connector->lid_notifier)) {
 		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("lid notifier registration failed\n");
-- 
2.2.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/