[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150109105712.GA1053@katana>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 11:57:12 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, Anders Berg <anders.berg@...gotech.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [wsa:i2c/quirks 7/11] drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-axxia.c:452:27:
sparse: symbol 'axxia_i2c_quirks' was not declared. Should it be static?
Hi Fengguang,
> It's normally private emails, except for the ones that carry patches
> with them. In which case public mailing lists will also be CCed.
OK, thought so.
> > Is there a way to achieve this? I know that adding "experimental" to the
> > branch name will skip the testing. Is there another pattern to prevent
> > sending mails to everyone?
>
> I wonder if the occasional public emails are acceptable to you.
Not really. If I push out development code which is good enough to be
build tested but not ready to be sent upstream yet, I think other people
and mailing lists should not be bothered.
> not, it'd be trivial for me to add a list of "personal git trees"
> where all emails including the auto generated patches will be kept
> private (if commit author == committer).
For my workflow, everything except "for-current" and "for-next" should
be private. I do appreciate the patches for those two, so thanks for
that in general!
All the best,
Wolfram
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists