[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150109132953.GA10543@u-isr-ctg-01>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 14:29:53 +0100
From: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@....fr>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
CC: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
Ron Minnich <rminnich@...dia.gov>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
<v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/9p: Initialize status in v9fs_file_do_lock.
Kirill A. Shutemov wrote on Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 03:20:51PM +0200:
> > Your patch will not BUG() if status is junk, BUT if status uninitialized
> > value is 0 and p9_client_lock_dotl then we'll return res=0 (success) and
> > not unlock before returning. My patch makes sure we'll return -ENOLCK.
>
> No, if p9_client_lock_dotl() return 0 it must set status. If it's not,
> that's bug on p9_client_lock_dotl() side and must be fixed.
I had that bit right, but I only remembered your second patch -- sorry.
It should be fine with your patchES, please disregard this one.
--
Dominique Martinet,
CEA
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists