[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+GjM+3M63amyh3Rvijkz7Lch_cdUt9vScc9wZeOubOPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 07:46:16 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
SH-Linux <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5][resend v4] of: replace Asahi Kasei Corp vendor prefix
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 4:07 AM, Kuninori Morimoto
<kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen
>
> Thank you for your feedback
>
>> > I'm sending this "of: replace Asahi Kasei Corp vendor prefix" during
>> > half-year (since Jun 2014) , many times. But, no-one care it.
>> > I don't know who is the best maintainer.
>> > - Stephen : because it has Tegra ?
>> > - Olof : because it has Tegra (= ARM) ?
>> > - Arnd : because it has Tegra (= ARM) ?
>> > - Matthias: because it has Tegra (= ARM SoC) ?
>> > - Rob : because DT ?
>> > - Andrew : Last chance ?
>> >
>> > But, could you please care this patch ?
>> > I will re-send it again
>>
>> It doesn't seem to be ack'd by any of the DT maintainers. Retro-actively
>> changing a DT vendor name would need that, I think.
>
> Rob ?
> I had sent this patch to him since half-years ago, many times...
> Or other maintainer ?
>
>> Thierry and Alex (both Tegra maintainers) appear to have ack'd it, so it
>> seems they expect it to go through some tree other than Tegra. Weren't
>> there a bunch of related patches along with this (e.g. updating relevant
>> drivers to support both prefixes?) so it was expected this patch would
>> be applied together with them?
>
> I guess they expected it goes to DT branch (?)
> This is only 1 patch. it doesn't have related patch-set
It is in my queue. If the users of it are fine with breaking things,
who am I to argue with them.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists