[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150109183857.53d701a4@armhf>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 18:38:57 +0100
From: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@....com>,
Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] drm/i2c: tda998x: Add DT support for audio
On Fri, 9 Jan 2015 14:57:41 +0000
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> Well, if we look at the HDMI specs, there is a field in the audio info
> frame (CA bits) which identifies the speaker allocation between the
> HDMI PCM channels and the physical speakers.
>
> It describes a limited set - essentially though, channel 0 is always
> front left, and channel 1 is always front right. Channel 2 is always
> LFE, and channel 3 is always front centre.
>
> Channel 0 and 1 are always allocated, but it's possible to have channels
> above 2 to be allocated independently of each other (eg, you could have
> 7, 6, 1, 0 allocated to front right centre, front left centre, right,
> left speakers - in that order.)
>
> As you point out, we don't have documentation which tells us know how
> these PCM channels map to I2S inputs.
I had a look at the TDA19988 (small) datasheet I have and at the HDMI
specs, and, yes, you are right: multi (stereo) channels implies speaker
mapping, and, then, that the I2S streams come from a same media source.
While, as said in the TDA19988 datasheet,
"The I2S-bus input interface receives an I2S-bus signal including
serial data, word select and serial clock",
it would be strange that these I2S buses come from different audio devices.
> What we do know is that there is a fixed mapping between AP pins and I2S
> channels (which are not PCM channels), but as you point out, we don't
> have any documentation which describes how the I2S channels (each with
> their own L+R words) map to the PCM channels - and we don't know whether
> the CA_I2S bits in that same register in the TDA998x have an effect on
> this.
HDMI talks about LPCM (Linear PCM) channels and TDA19988 talks about
I2S-bus (stereo) channels. For me, it seems obvious that these channels
are correlated:
- LPCM-0 is I2S-bus-0-left (FL)
- LPCM-1 is I2S-bus-0-right (FR)
- LPCM-2 is I2S-bus-1-left (LFE)
- LPCM-3 is I2S-bus-1-right (FC)
...
> Does anyone have a TDA998x setup which has an I2S source connected to
> the TDA998x I2S channel 1, and who has a HDMI sink which will accept
> the LFE/FC channels? If so, producing a description of how the CA_I2S
> bits and enabling I2S input pins influences the mapping would be a good
> idea.
I could not find a description of these CA_I2S bits.
> If we don't have that, I'd recommend splitting the DT property into
> "audio inputs for I2S" and "audio input for SPDIF" (only one can be
> active with SPDIF).
>
> If we want to support more than one SPDIF input (which must be mutually
> exclusive) I'd recommend to look at the OF graph stuff we use in DRM -
> one port for each "mode" - eg, I2S, SPDIF in on AP2, SPDIF in on AP3.
> Each port node can specify the AP pins which should be enabled.
I agree. There are one S/PDIF port and one I2S port.
So, which syntax?
I proposed:
audio-ports = <0x04>, <0x03>;
audio-port-names = "spdif", "i2s";
Do you better like:
audio-spdif-port = <0x04>;
audio-i2s-port = <0x03>;
--
Ken ar c'hentaƱ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists