[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJAp7OjYPCbQ54sbzeNBt9WZvxOFKOPNQG-GtE6XGCAxCehL=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:31:19 -0800
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] soc: qcom: Add TCSR driver
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 01:06:56AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Thursday 08 January 2015 16:52:56 Andy Gross wrote:
>> > This patch adds support for the TCSR (Top Control and Status Register) IP block
>> > that is present in the Qualcomm IPQ8064, APQ8064, and some later processors.
>> > This block contains additional configuration and mux settings for various
>> > peripherals in the system, including the ADM DMA block and USB controller.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>
>> >
>>
>> It sounds like this is a collection of random registers. Have you considered
>> making it a syscon node instead?
>
> That's a capital idea and solves my probe_defer issue more cleanly. I'll rework
> and resend.
>
Then I guess I need to rework the tcsr-mutex driver to operate on top
a syson instead.
Do we want the same for the sfpb mutex or should I continue to ioremap for that?
Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists