linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC v10 08/19] leds: Add support for max77693 mfd flash cell

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150109184606.GJ18076@amd>
Date:	Fri, 9 Jan 2015 19:46:06 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	kyungmin.park@...sung.com, b.zolnierkie@...sung.com,
	cooloney@...il.com, rpurdie@...ys.net, sakari.ailus@....fi,
	s.nawrocki@...sung.com, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v10 08/19] leds: Add support for max77693 mfd flash
 cell

On Fri 2015-01-09 16:22:58, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> This patch adds led-flash support to Maxim max77693 chipset.
> A device can be exposed to user space through LED subsystem
> sysfs interface. Device supports up to two leds which can
> work in flash and torch mode. The leds can be triggered
> externally or by software.
> 

> +struct max77693_sub_led {
> +	/* related FLED output identifier */

->flash LED, about 4x.

> +/* split composite current @i into two @iout according to @imax weights */
> +static void __max77693_calc_iout(u32 iout[2], u32 i, u32 imax[2])
> +{
> +	u64 t = i;
> +
> +	t *= imax[1];
> +	do_div(t, imax[0] + imax[1]);
> +
> +	iout[1] = (u32)t / FLASH_IOUT_STEP * FLASH_IOUT_STEP;
> +	iout[0] = i - iout[1];
> +}

Is 64-bit arithmetics neccessary here? Could we do the FLASH_IOUT_STEP
divisons before t *=, so that 64-bit division is not neccessary?

> +static int max77693_led_flash_strobe_get(
> +				struct led_classdev_flash *fled_cdev,
> +				bool *state)
> +{
> +	struct max77693_sub_led *sub_led = flcdev_to_sub_led(fled_cdev);
> +	struct max77693_led_device *led = sub_led_to_led(sub_led);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!state)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&led->lock);
> +
> +	ret = max77693_strobe_status_get(led, state);
> +
> +	*state = !!(*state && (led->strobing_sub_led_id == sub_led->fled_id));
> +
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&led->lock);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}

Maybe remove some empty lines?

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/