linux-kernel - Re: noisy selinux messages on tmpfs mount.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6645675.NppomaThWx@sifl>
Date:	Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:55:37 -0500
From:	Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
Cc:	Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley@...il.com>,
	selinux <selinux@...ho.nsa.gov>,
	James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@...ch.ncsc.mil>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: noisy selinux messages on tmpfs mount.

On Friday, January 09, 2015 02:13:29 PM Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 08:06:49AM -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>  > We already reduced that message to KERN_DEBUG.  Is that not sufficient?
> 
> That doesn't really help with the flooding of dmesg, so no.
> I should also note that it's not just logging in that creates a new
> session, it also seems to be getting triggered by cron jobs, or
> whatever the systemd replacement is.

I wonder if this is cron/systemd/whatever creating a new namespace and 
mounting a new tmpfs in the namespace?  If yes, I wonder if we could limit the 
messages to the initial namespace ... ?

-- 
paul moore
security @ redhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/