| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CANLsYkzQXN9xcs1aOGVL-WVV-b+zjWJJ3cFu7nmG6b-G=U+Wtw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 16:37:41 -0700
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"patches@...aro.org" <patches@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] ARM: vexpress/TC2: Add generic power domain awareness
to scp driver
On 7 January 2015 at 04:39, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com> wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 04:37:11PM +0000, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c
>> index f61158c6ce71..4ff1009f2d16 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c
>> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
>> #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/semaphore.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> +#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
>>
>> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>>
>> @@ -92,6 +94,9 @@
>> #define STAT_ERR(type) ((1 << 1) << (type << 2))
>> #define RESPONSE_MASK(type) (STAT_COMPLETE(type) | STAT_ERR(type))
>>
>> +static atomic_t gpd_A7_cluster_on = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
>> +static atomic_t gpd_A15_cluster_on = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
>> +
>> struct ve_spc_opp {
>> unsigned long freq;
>> unsigned long u_volt;
>> @@ -209,12 +214,19 @@ void ve_spc_set_resume_addr(u32 cluster, u32 cpu, u32 addr)
>> */
>> void ve_spc_powerdown(u32 cluster, bool enable)
>> {
>> + bool is_a15;
>> u32 pwdrn_reg;
>>
>> if (cluster >= MAX_CLUSTERS)
>> return;
>>
>> - pwdrn_reg = cluster_is_a15(cluster) ? A15_PWRDN_EN : A7_PWRDN_EN;
>> + is_a15 = cluster_is_a15(cluster);
>> + if (is_a15 && atomic_read(&gpd_A15_cluster_on))
>> + return;
>> + else if (!is_a15 && atomic_read(&gpd_A7_cluster_on))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + pwdrn_reg = is_a15 ? A15_PWRDN_EN : A7_PWRDN_EN;
>> writel_relaxed(enable, info->baseaddr + pwdrn_reg);
>
> I do not like this, for multiple reasons.
>
> (1) It might not do what you want. I am not sure that nuking the power
> down request is safe. I have to check the power controller behaviour
> when a core is going through power down sequence but the PWRDN_EN
> bit is not set. You might end up with cores that are just being
> reset on pending IRQ (defeating your purpose) or stuck forever.
I understand your concerns.
> (2) It must be done by attaching the power domains to CPUidle states.
> Idle states are automagically disabled when the domain is turned on, it
> is cleaner, and more robust than what you do here.
I like that idea.
> On the downside,
> we have to work together to add power domain information to DT idle
> states specifications/bindings.
>
> (see pm_genpd_attach_cpuidle() drivers/base/power/domain.c)
I definitely will.
>
> (3) I do not like the is_a15 comparisons, I think this can be done with
> cluster indexing the atomic variable, but since you are removing
> this code ;-) it does not really matter.
Agreed.
>
>> }
>>
>> @@ -447,6 +459,116 @@ static int ve_init_opp_table(struct device *cpu_dev)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_OF
>> +static int scp_power_on_pd_A7(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * Simply tell mcpm we need power. Nothing else needs to be done
>> + * as CPUs in the cluster are already powered when we reach this point.
>> + */
>> + atomic_set(&gpd_A7_cluster_on, 1);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int scp_power_off_pd_A7(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
>> +{
>> + atomic_set(&gpd_A7_cluster_on, 0);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int scp_power_on_pd_A15(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * Simply tell mcpm we need power. Nothing else needs to be done
>> + * as CPUs in the cluster are already powered when we reach this point.
>> + */
>> + atomic_set(&gpd_A15_cluster_on, 1);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int scp_power_off_pd_A15(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
>> +{
>> + atomic_set(&gpd_A15_cluster_on, 0);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int (*const scp_power_fct[MAX_CLUSTERS * 2])
>> + (struct generic_pm_domain *domain) = {
>> + scp_power_on_pd_A15, scp_power_off_pd_A15,
>> + scp_power_on_pd_A7, scp_power_off_pd_A7};
>
> I think you can remove the functions above and the corresponding atomic
> variables, see my comment above.
>
>> +static void scp_init_pd(struct generic_pm_domain *pd,
>> + struct device_node *np,
>> + struct platform_device *pdev, int cluster)
>> +{
>> + char name[50];
>> + int index = cluster * 2;
>> +
>> + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s-%d", np->name, cluster);
>> +
>> + pd->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + pd->power_on = scp_power_fct[index];
>> + pd->power_off = scp_power_fct[index + 1];
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pd);
>> +
>> + pm_genpd_init(pd, NULL, true);
>> + pm_genpd_poweron(pd);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static __init int ve_spc_gpd_init(void)
>> +{
>> + struct genpd_onecell_data *data;
>> + struct generic_pm_domain *pd, **cluster_pds;
>> + struct platform_device *pdev;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> + int count;
>> +
>> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
>> + "arm,vexpress-power-controller");
>
> See the bindings discussions, there is not such a thing as
> vexpress-power-controller.
I looked at other examples that prefixed the "power-controller" part
with something specific. In thinking further on it
"arm,power-controller,v2p-ca15_a7" is likely a better choice.
>
>> + if (!np)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + cluster_pds = kzalloc(sizeof(struct generic_pm_domain *) * MAX_CLUSTERS,
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!cluster_pds)
>> + goto err_cluster_kzalloc;
>
> You are freeing a pointer that failed to be allocated.
>
>> +
>> + data = kzalloc(sizeof(struct genpd_onecell_data), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!data)
>> + goto err_data;
>
> Mmm...is that the label you want to jump to ? it fails to put the OF
> node.
>
>> +
>> + pdev = of_find_device_by_node(np);
>> + dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +
>> + for (count = 0; count < MAX_CLUSTERS; count++) {
>> + pd = kzalloc(sizeof(struct generic_pm_domain), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!pd)
>> + goto err_pd_kzalloc;
>
> This label does not free the data pointer. I think you should rework
> the error exit paths.
>
>> + scp_init_pd(pd, np, pdev, count);
>> + cluster_pds[count] = pd;
>> + }
>> +
>> + data->num_domains = count;
>> + data->domains = cluster_pds;
>> +
>> + of_genpd_add_provider_onecell(np, data);
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err_pd_kzalloc:
>> + while (--count >= 0)
>> + kfree(cluster_pds[count]);
>> +
>> +err_cluster_kzalloc:
>> + of_node_put(np);
>> +err_data:
>> + kfree(cluster_pds);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +}
>> +arch_initcall(ve_spc_gpd_init);
>
> It should not be an arch initcall, call it from spc_init, and make it an
> empty static inline if !CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_OF, eg:
That was my first intention but calling @platform_set_drvdata(); on
the node returned by @of_find_compatible_node() crashed the system. I
will investigate further.
>
> static inline int ve_spc_gpd_init(void)
> {
> return -ENOTSUPP;
> }
>
> Lorenzo
>
>> +#endif
>> +
>> int __init ve_spc_init(void __iomem *baseaddr, u32 a15_clusid, int irq)
>> {
>> int ret;
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists