[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <000001d02ccd$fa6d4f90$ef47eeb0$@samsung.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 20:06:30 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
To: 'Jaegeuk Kim' <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc: 'Changman Lee' <cm224.lee@...sung.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev][PATCH 1/2] f2fs: get rid of kzalloc in
__recover_inline_status
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@...nel.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 3:32 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: Changman Lee; linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev][PATCH 1/2] f2fs: get rid of kzalloc in __recover_inline_status
>
> Hi Chao,
>
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 02:28:43PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> > We use kzalloc to allocate memory in __recover_inline_status, and use this
> > all-zero memory to check the inline date content of inode page by comparing
> > them. This is low effective and not needed, let's check inline date content
> > directly.
> >
[snip]
>
> I think *goto recovery* is not a good way.
>
> How's like this?
> If you don't mind, I'll merge the patch with this.
It's OK, thank you!
Regards,
Yu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists