linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] watchdog: at91rm9200: use the regmap from mfd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150110184146.GH2447@piout.net>
Date:	Sat, 10 Jan 2015 19:41:46 +0100
From:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] watchdog: at91rm9200: use the regmap from mfd

On 09/01/2015 at 16:39:21 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote :
> On 01/09/2015 01:51 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >  /* ......................................................................... */
> >@@ -204,6 +201,7 @@ static struct miscdevice at91wdt_miscdev = {
> >  static int at91wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	int res;
> >+	regmap_st = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> >
> 
> Is it guaranteed that parent is never NULL, and that the parent's
> drvdata is always set ?
> 

The only way to probe the driver left is to use platform_data. It is
done from the MFD driver. If you prefer, I can test for NULL here and
return.

> Also, it seems that regmap_st will be overwritten if the device
> is already open (see code below). That may not be a good idea.
> 

I'm not sure what you meani, pdev->dev.parent and at91wdt_miscdev.parent
are not the same thing. I didn't touch the code below but I believe
there is no reason to pass in the probe twice and return -EBUSY.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/