linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10][RFC] Increased clocksource validation and cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150111114124.GD4467@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sun, 11 Jan 2015 12:41:24 +0100
From:	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10][RFC] Increased clocksource validation and cleanups

On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 04:34:18PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> So this series is the result of earlier discussions with Linus
> and his suggestions around improvements to clocksource validation
> in the hope we can more easily catch bad hardware.

Why penalize most users just because of a random hardware failure?
Why not make the "catching code" a compile time option?

Thanks,
Richard

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/