[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <81b94fc89c774b71a967fc93823e9c63@EX132MBOX1A.de2.local>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 11:59:45 +0000
From: "Stoidner, Christoph" <c.stoidner@...ero.de>
To: "paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: AW: Question concerning RCU
Hi Paul,
many thanks for your fast answer!
Now I have changed my application in that way, that it does not require
Xenomai/I-Pipe anymore. That means my kernel is build now from
mainline source, with preempt_rt only and no Xenomai or I-Pipe.
However the problem is exact the same. After some runtime (minutes
or hours) the kernel freezes and JTAG debugging shows that it ends-up
in an endless loop in rcu_print_task_stall (as described before).
> First I have seen this. Were you doing lots of CPU-hotplug operations?
My system has only one core. So I think there should not be any
CPU-hotplugging.
> If you have more CPUs than the value of CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT (which
> defaults to 16), and if your workload offlined a full block of CPUs (full
> blocks being CPUs 0-15, 16-31, 32-47, and so on for the default value
> of CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT), then there is a theoretical issue that -might-
> cause the problem that you are seeing.
Also this could not only happen on a single core system. Am I right?
I have no idea how to find the problem. Do you have any more hints or ideas?
Here is a backtrace when the problem has occurred on the system without Xenomai/I-Pipe:
#0 rcu_print_task_stall (rnp=0xc0498dc8 <rcu_preempt_state>) at kernel/rcutree_plugin.h:528
#1 0xc005cabc in print_other_cpu_stall (rsp=0xc0498dc8 <rcu_preempt_state>) at kernel/rcutree.c:885
#2 check_cpu_stall (rdp=0x80000093, rsp=0xc0498dc8 <rcu_preempt_state>) at kernel/rcutree.c:977
#3 __rcu_pending (rdp=0x80000093, rsp=0xc0498dc8 <rcu_preempt_state>) at kernel/rcutree.c:2750
#4 rcu_pending (cpu=<optimized out>) at kernel/rcutree.c:2800
#5 rcu_check_callbacks (cpu=<optimized out>, user=<optimized out>) at kernel/rcutree.c:2179
#6 0xc0027648 in update_process_times (user_tick=0) at kernel/timer.c:1427
#7 0xc004e840 in tick_sched_timer (timer=0xc0498860 <tick_cpu_sched>) at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:1095
#8 0xc003a0dc in __run_hrtimer (timer=0xc0498860 <tick_cpu_sched>, now=<optimized out>) at kernel/hrtimer.c:1363
#9 0xc003ab4c in hrtimer_interrupt (dev=<optimized out>) at kernel/hrtimer.c:1582
#10 0xc02bf7bc in mxs_timer_interrupt (irq=<optimized out>, dev_id=<optimized out>) at drivers/clocksource/mxs_timer.c:132
#11 0xc0055154 in handle_irq_event_percpu (desc=0xc7804c00, action=0xc04b0520 <mxs_timer_irq>) at kernel/irq/handle.c:144
#12 0xc0055320 in handle_irq_event (desc=0xc7804c00) at kernel/irq/handle.c:197
#13 0xc00578b8 in handle_level_irq (irq=<optimized out>, desc=0xc7804c00) at kernel/irq/chip.c:406
#14 0xc0054aec in generic_handle_irq_desc (desc=<optimized out>, irq=16) at include/linux/irqdesc.h:115
#15 generic_handle_irq (irq=16) at kernel/irq/irqdesc.c:314
#16 0xc000f58c in handle_IRQ (irq=16, regs=<optimized out>) at arch/arm/kernel/irq.c:80
#17 0xc000e360 in __irq_svc () at arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:202
#18 0xc000e360 in __irq_svc () at arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:202
#19 0xc000e360 in __irq_svc () at arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:202
#20 0xc000e360 in __irq_svc () at arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:202
...
Thanks and regards,
Christoph
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists