linux-kernel - Re: [3.16.y-ckt stable] Linux 3.16.7-ckt4 stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150112215941.GJ2455@charon>
Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2015 21:59:41 +0000
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	Thomas Voegtle <tv@...96.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: [3.16.y-ckt stable] Linux 3.16.7-ckt4 stable review

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 09:30:45PM +0100, Thomas Voegtle wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Luis Henriques wrote:
> 
> >This is the start of the review cycle for the Linux 3.16.7-ckt4 stable kernel.
> >
> >This version contains 216 new patches, summarized below.  The new patches are
> >posted as replies to this message and also available in this git branch:
> >
> >http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/linux.git;h=linux-3.16.y-review;a=shortlog
> >
> >git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/linux.git  linux-3.16.y-review
> >
> >The review period for version 3.16.7-ckt4 will be open for the next three days.
> >To report a problem, please reply to the relevant follow-up patch message.
> >
> >For more information about the Linux 3.16.y-ckt extended stable kernel version,
> >see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable .
> 
> 
> Something is wrong with drm/i915 (I guess). I had a terrible memleak on Xorg
> when using mplayer using more and more RAM, and then the system is swapping
> itself to death.
> 
> I'm using a openSUSE 13.1 (x86_64) on a Baytrail J1900 (this is Intel HD
> Gen7).
> 
> 

Thank you for reporting, Thomas.  Can you please confirm that this is
actually a regression in 3.16.7-ckt4 (i.e., that you can't reproduce
it in 3.16.7-ckt3)?  If so, is it possible to bisecting it?

Cheers,
--
Luís

>       Thomas
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/