[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54B3834D.6090602@nod.at>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:18:21 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: joe@...ches.com, coreteam@...filter.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
vyasevic@...hat.com, jiri@...nulli.us, vfalico@...il.com,
therbert@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
jmorris@...ei.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu,
kaber@...sh.net, pablo@...filter.org, kay@...y.org,
stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x_tables: Factor out 16bit aligment ifname_compare()
Am 12.01.2015 um 03:50 schrieb David Miller:
> From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:42:37 +0100
>
>> Joe, I really don't care. This is the least significant
>> patch of the series.
>> I'll no longer waste my time with that.
>
> If you're not willing to fix stylistic issues now, then nobody should
> bother wasting their time on the high level issues of your patch.
>
> Just fix these things now rather than being difficult, this is a part
> of patch review that everyone has to do, not just you.
I apologize, it was not my intention to be difficult.
Please note that the stylistic issue is not a warning produced
by checkpatch.pl. If you and netfilter folks now prefer bool
for such string compare functions I'll happily address this in
v2 of my series.
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists