linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] gpio/gpiolib-of: Create of_mm_gpiochip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYq_tyamCzM575D8vdMg_rvDy93fSm+7Oss3tQzFu+TTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:30:13 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
Cc:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] gpio/gpiolib-of: Create of_mm_gpiochip_remove

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
<ricardo.ribalda@...il.com> wrote:

> Create counterpart of of_mm_gpiochip_add(). This way the modules that
> can be removable do not duplicate the cleanup code.
>
> Suggested-by: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>

Patch applied.

Hm.

$ git grep of_mm_gpiochip_add
arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm1.c:     return of_mm_gpiochip_add(np, mm_gc);
arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm1.c:     return of_mm_gpiochip_add(np, mm_gc);
arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm_common.c:       return of_mm_gpiochip_add(np, mm_gc);
arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_gpio.c:              ret =
of_mm_gpiochip_add(np, mm_gc);
arch/powerpc/sysdev/qe_lib/gpio.c:              ret =
of_mm_gpiochip_add(np, mm_gc);
arch/powerpc/sysdev/simple_gpio.c:      ret = of_mm_gpiochip_add(np, mm_gc);
drivers/gpio/gpio-ge.c: return of_mm_gpiochip_add(pdev->dev.of_node, mmchip);
drivers/gpio/gpio-mm-lantiq.c:  ret =
of_mm_gpiochip_add(pdev->dev.of_node, &chip->mmchip);
drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc5200.c:    ret =
of_mm_gpiochip_add(ofdev->dev.of_node, &chip->mmchip);
drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc5200.c:    ret =
of_mm_gpiochip_add(ofdev->dev.of_node, &chip->mmchip);
drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c:    ret = of_mm_gpiochip_add(np, mm_gc);
drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:     status = of_mm_gpiochip_add(np, &chip->mmchip);
drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c:      status =
of_mm_gpiochip_add(pdev->dev.of_node, &(controller->chip));

Should these all be patched to use this, or reviewed for applicability?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/