linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] gpio/gpiolib-of: Create of_mm_gpiochip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPybu_1n0mGjm+Si_e4soVcQgGbP=fPFXDU71f3bvABDLraNVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:31:35 +0100
From:	Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] gpio/gpiolib-of: Create of_mm_gpiochip_remove

Hello

I think that only gpio-mpc5200.c would benefit from the new API, I can
send a patchset to support removal and use the new API if you want.

Thanks!

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
> <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> Create counterpart of of_mm_gpiochip_add(). This way the modules that
>> can be removable do not duplicate the cleanup code.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
>
> Patch applied.
>
> Hm.
>
> $ git grep of_mm_gpiochip_add
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm1.c:     return of_mm_gpiochip_add(np, mm_gc);
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm1.c:     return of_mm_gpiochip_add(np, mm_gc);
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm_common.c:       return of_mm_gpiochip_add(np, mm_gc);
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_gpio.c:              ret =
> of_mm_gpiochip_add(np, mm_gc);
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/qe_lib/gpio.c:              ret =
> of_mm_gpiochip_add(np, mm_gc);
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/simple_gpio.c:      ret = of_mm_gpiochip_add(np, mm_gc);
> drivers/gpio/gpio-ge.c: return of_mm_gpiochip_add(pdev->dev.of_node, mmchip);
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mm-lantiq.c:  ret =
> of_mm_gpiochip_add(pdev->dev.of_node, &chip->mmchip);
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc5200.c:    ret =
> of_mm_gpiochip_add(ofdev->dev.of_node, &chip->mmchip);
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc5200.c:    ret =
> of_mm_gpiochip_add(ofdev->dev.of_node, &chip->mmchip);
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c:    ret = of_mm_gpiochip_add(np, mm_gc);
> drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:     status = of_mm_gpiochip_add(np, &chip->mmchip);
> drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c:      status =
> of_mm_gpiochip_add(pdev->dev.of_node, &(controller->chip));
>
> Should these all be patched to use this, or reviewed for applicability?
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij



-- 
Ricardo Ribalda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/