[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1421064958.22660.54.camel@x220>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:15:58 +0100
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] usb: atmel_usba_udc: Rework at91sam9rl errata
handling
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 11:57 +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> at91sam9rl SoC has an erratum forcing us to toggle the BIAS on USB
> suspend/resume events.
>
> This specific handling is only activated when CONFIG_ARCH_AT91SAM9RL is
> set and this option is only set when building a non-DT kernel, which is
> problematic since non-DT support for at91sam9rl SoC has been removed.
This sentence is not entirely correct. Commit bcf8c7e7703b ("ARM: at91:
remove at91sam9rl legacy board support") actually removed the Kconfig
symbol ARCH_AT91SAM9RL entirely. So the check for CONFIG_ARCH_AT91SAM9RL
has been pointless since (next-20141110 and) v3.19-rc1. See my report at
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/10/232 .
(I stumbled on this patch because I contemplated sending a patch to
simply remove the check for CONFIG_ARCH_AT91SAM9RL and the currently
useless function toggle_bias.)
> Rework the toggle_bias implementation to attach it to the "at91sam9rl-udc"
> compatible string.
>
> Add new compatible strings to avoid executing at91sam9rl erratum handling
> on other SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists